G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 SO-DIMM kit is the ideal system upgrade and provides faster data transfer and higher energy efficiency than ever. Experience a new standard of speed with Ripjaws DDR4 SO-DIMM today.
G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 SO-DIMM kit is the ideal system upgrade and provides faster data transfer and higher energy efficiency than ever. Experience a new standard of speed with Ripjaws DDR4 SO-DIMM today.
in 3 offers
last seen 27 May 2026
The lowest price we last saw for G.SKILL Ripjaws F4-2400C16S-8GRS 8GB (1x8GB) 2400MHz DDR4 SODIMM was $84.39 at eBay.com.au, compared across 3 retailers (last seen 27 May 2026). Prices may have changed since.
The all-time low we recorded was $23.00 on 11 Dec 2024.
Prices last updated 27 May 2026.
G.SKILL Ripjaws F4-2400C16S-8GRS 8GB (1x8GB) 2400MHz DDR4 SODIMM
G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 SO-DIMM kit is the ideal system upgrade and provides faster data transfer and higher energy efficiency than ever. Experience a new standard of speed with Ripjaws DDR4 SO-DIMM today.
G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 SO-DIMM kit is the ideal system upgrade and provides faster data transfer and higher energy efficiency than ever. Experience a new standard of speed with Ripjaws DDR4 SO-DIMM today.
Last updated at 27/05/2026 12:09:29
G.Skill Ripjaws 8GB (2 x 4GB) 260-Pin DDR4 SO-DIMM DDR4 2400 (PC4 19200) Laptop Memory Model F4-2400C16D-8GRS
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
G.skill Ripjaws 8gb Ddr4 2400 Sodimm Ram 1x8gb (f4-2400c16s-8grs)
Delivery $46.07
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
G.SKILL Ripjaws Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 260-Pin DDR4 SO-DIMM DDR4 2400 (PC4 19200) Laptop Memory Model F4-2400C16D-8GRS
Delivery $67.15
originally posted on newegg.com
This honestly should be illegal. With many newer games seeing a 10% performance difference from 2 dual rank sticks over 2 single rank sticks (and some applications being impacted even more than that) this should be considered a different product. For example, if this RAM was actually DDR4-3000 but sold as DDR4-3200, that would probably be illegal, but that would actually have a smaller performance difference in some applications than going from dual rank to single rank on only 2 sticks of memory. Thanks a lot G.SKILL for letting half the data pins on my sticks do literally nothing. This would be fine on a desktop with 4 RAM slots as it could use the data pins on a different stick while it waits for data on another stick on the same channel. I would just simply need ... MoreThis honestly should be illegal. With many newer games seeing a 10% performance difference from 2 dual rank sticks over 2 single rank sticks (and some applications being impacted even more than that) this should be considered a different product. For example, if this RAM was actually DDR4-3000 but sold as DDR4-3200, that would probably be illegal, but that would actually have a smaller performance difference in some applications than going from dual rank to single rank on only 2 sticks of memory. Thanks a lot G.SKILL for letting half the data pins on my sticks do literally nothing. This would be fine on a desktop with 4 RAM slots as it could use the data pins on a different stick while it waits for data on another stick on the same channel. I would just simply need to populate all 4 slots. But obviously the overwhelming majority of these are going into laptops with only 2 RAM slots.
originally posted on newegg.com
Was going to go with a Crucial 2x16GB kit, but saw these on a lightning sale for just a little more. Didn't see any shots of the 32GB sticks being dual ranked, but took the risk seeing that the 16GB sticks were dual rank. It paid off - confirmed that the 32GB sticks are dual ranked. Previously had 2x8GB single tank sticks with the Same timing. Saw a notable jump in CPU score in 3D Mark (7300 to 9100) from that change alone. Big jump in write and copy speeds, nominal bump in read speeds just slightly above margin of error. I use this system for music/studio work and not gaming, so I don't really have any before/after benchmarks for that, but there's plenty of articles out there that show decent gains for dual rank, especially with Ryzen.
originally posted on neweggbusiness.com
Bought as an upgrade to max out a few years-old laptop and stop Windows 10's constant thrashing to swap file on HDD. Never any issues. Really nice price. The capacity is overkill for most of my tasks, but it's so great to have applications open and re-open so fast with so much cached in the copious unused RAM. I've not done any over-clocking or other tweaks, so I can comment on how far you can actually push them. With this much RAM space, why bother though? The lifetime warranty for the cheapest available part is also a nice peace of mind to have, though I've never needed it as these have been solid since day one.
| Warranty | Standard Manufacturer's Warranty |
G.Skill Ripjaws 8GB (2 x 4GB) 260-Pin DDR4 SO-DIMM DDR4 2400 (PC4 19200) Laptop Memory Model F4-2400C16D-8GRS
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
G.skill Ripjaws 8gb Ddr4 2400 Sodimm Ram 1x8gb (f4-2400c16s-8grs)
Delivery $46.07
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
G.SKILL Ripjaws Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 260-Pin DDR4 SO-DIMM DDR4 2400 (PC4 19200) Laptop Memory Model F4-2400C16D-8GRS
Delivery $67.15
This honestly should be illegal. With many newer games seeing a 10% performance difference from 2 dual rank sticks over 2 single rank sticks (and some applications being impacted even more than that) this should be considered a different product. For example, if this RAM was actually DDR4-3000 but sold as DDR4-3200, that would probably be illegal, but that would actually have a smaller performance difference in some applications than going from dual rank to single rank on only 2 sticks of memory. Thanks a lot G.SKILL for letting half the data pins on my sticks do literally nothing. This would be fine on a desktop with 4 RAM slots as it could use the data pins on a different stick while it waits for data on another stick on the same channel. I would just simply need ... MoreThis honestly should be illegal. With many newer games seeing a 10% performance difference from 2 dual rank sticks over 2 single rank sticks (and some applications being impacted even more than that) this should be considered a different product. For example, if this RAM was actually DDR4-3000 but sold as DDR4-3200, that would probably be illegal, but that would actually have a smaller performance difference in some applications than going from dual rank to single rank on only 2 sticks of memory. Thanks a lot G.SKILL for letting half the data pins on my sticks do literally nothing. This would be fine on a desktop with 4 RAM slots as it could use the data pins on a different stick while it waits for data on another stick on the same channel. I would just simply need to populate all 4 slots. But obviously the overwhelming majority of these are going into laptops with only 2 RAM slots.
Was going to go with a Crucial 2x16GB kit, but saw these on a lightning sale for just a little more. Didn't see any shots of the 32GB sticks being dual ranked, but took the risk seeing that the 16GB sticks were dual rank. It paid off - confirmed that the 32GB sticks are dual ranked. Previously had 2x8GB single tank sticks with the Same timing. Saw a notable jump in CPU score in 3D Mark (7300 to 9100) from that change alone. Big jump in write and copy speeds, nominal bump in read speeds just slightly above margin of error. I use this system for music/studio work and not gaming, so I don't really have any before/after benchmarks for that, but there's plenty of articles out there that show decent gains for dual rank, especially with Ryzen.
Bought as an upgrade to max out a few years-old laptop and stop Windows 10's constant thrashing to swap file on HDD. Never any issues. Really nice price. The capacity is overkill for most of my tasks, but it's so great to have applications open and re-open so fast with so much cached in the copious unused RAM. I've not done any over-clocking or other tweaks, so I can comment on how far you can actually push them. With this much RAM space, why bother though? The lifetime warranty for the cheapest available part is also a nice peace of mind to have, though I've never needed it as these have been solid since day one.
This was one of the only recommended brands for upgrading my Gigabyte Aero 15x v8 laptop. It came with a single 16gb stick of Kingston RAM, which worked great, but not quite enough for my needs, i.e. video editing, photo editing, coding, gaming, firefox with 100+ tabs open, etc... lol. I read a lot of stories of struggle by others with this laptop who tried to find a second RAM stick that would work with their existing one, some with bad results, and most with mixed results (RAM ran slower, etc). I swapped out the original stick for this pair, turned it on and it immediately booted and fully recognized the new set at full speed and capacity, no problem at all. I am extremely pleased with it! It's very snappy, obviously (dual sticks vs single, plus slightly lower CAS ... MoreThis was one of the only recommended brands for upgrading my Gigabyte Aero 15x v8 laptop. It came with a single 16gb stick of Kingston RAM, which worked great, but not quite enough for my needs, i.e. video editing, photo editing, coding, gaming, firefox with 100+ tabs open, etc... lol. I read a lot of stories of struggle by others with this laptop who tried to find a second RAM stick that would work with their existing one, some with bad results, and most with mixed results (RAM ran slower, etc). I swapped out the original stick for this pair, turned it on and it immediately booted and fully recognized the new set at full speed and capacity, no problem at all. I am extremely pleased with it! It's very snappy, obviously (dual sticks vs single, plus slightly lower CAS latency). I ran memtest for 4-5 hours on the first evening, absolutely no errors. Been using it for 2 weeks now, all is well. I'm glad I went with these!
The product i have not had any prob with, in 10 years. So just like anyone else, there must be some good testing and guidelines being gone threw. Unlike other places that are not iso regulated or otherwise for quality. I worked testing chips for other products. As for shipping and price, everyone knows how that is. No where near what it was. Make no mistake, I will mention the whole experience. The product being good or trash, the length of wait time and how the company selling has treated me in detail. There is no sugar coating or non-sense with me about that. Respect is earned not given, companies that produce trash do not deserve respect. Nor do companies that ruin other people property and try to blame them for it.
Got this in today to upgrade my ROG Strix G15 laptop from 8gb to 32gb. The ram slots were a little finicky to get them seated in correctly. But not an issue with the ram, but rather the ram slot itself being a little smaller than it should have been. The G15 Immediately recognized the new memory kit and needed no finessing to work. Popped into a game of Warzone and found the game loading faster, switching menus easier and gameplay was faster and smoother. I went from 55-60fps on the previous setup to 75-85. This is the only hardware change Ive made so Im extremely happy so far! I would definitely recommend this as a great value upgrade to your laptop!
This was the cheapest 64GB DDR4 kit with less than 2 CHF for 1 GB.Works perfectly with Ryzen 9 Pro 3900 at 1.28V as 3200MHz CL16. It was able to start OS at 3600MHz CL19, but wasn't stable at 1.35V and I wasn't comfortable to go over that voltage for my daily rider.Had to change the orientation of Noctua NH-D15 due to the radiator's height of this memory modules. It also forced me to change the direction of the whole airflow in the case, but I had to clean it anyway, so not too much extra work.
I would recommend these RAM cards when in search of the basic need of increasing your notebook's overall available RAM. This was a purchase of necessity, not exactly preference. *Be sure to know what RAM type your notebook needs! (DDR wise) I regularly play demanding video games on my notebook which originally came with 12gb of RAM. I would constantly hit this limit (obviously). Vast improvement with 32GB, "breathing room" if you will. I do not know enough about ram to effectively review how these cards compete with other comparable RAM cards and brands. Your in-dept review on card stats & performance is hopefully contained within another review. GLHF!
I have an Atari VCS console from Dec 2020 where G.Skill Ripjaws works fine, BUT I got second console in Dec 2021 and even the the part number was the same for the G.Skill memory (and specs) it would not work. I know that my newer Atari VCS is the issue because when took this new set of G.Skill the memory out my other Atari VCS and put in the new one it booted without issue. G.Skill sells it it as the exact same part number as my first set (same part, same UPC, same specs), but it isn't the same as the stock they sold in Dec 2020. I think G.Skill changed parts for something cheaper in the year since the set I got for my backer unit (probably because of COVID shortages and they got some cheaper components). Apparently the Atari VCS MB has a fail safe mode that when ... MoreI have an Atari VCS console from Dec 2020 where G.Skill Ripjaws works fine, BUT I got second console in Dec 2021 and even the the part number was the same for the G.Skill memory (and specs) it would not work. I know that my newer Atari VCS is the issue because when took this new set of G.Skill the memory out my other Atari VCS and put in the new one it booted without issue. G.Skill sells it it as the exact same part number as my first set (same part, same UPC, same specs), but it isn't the same as the stock they sold in Dec 2020. I think G.Skill changed parts for something cheaper in the year since the set I got for my backer unit (probably because of COVID shortages and they got some cheaper components). Apparently the Atari VCS MB has a fail safe mode that when memory doesn't work it will use the default values regardless of what the setting are you have. After setting the timing the Atari VCS goes to full fans on next boot and will not boot. Then when then you unplug the power and plug back in again you can boot. The BIOS will show you setting but when you run CPUID you will see that the memory is only at 2400Mhz and task manager shows only 2 GB allocated regardless of what you have in the BIOS. Do yourself a favor and by the TEAMGROUP Elite DDR4 32GB Kit (TED432G3200C22DC-S01) memory.
Now, about WHY such RAM is needed. This situation causes people to have to get more RAM like this product. This product helps the situation... So, not unique to this product, boosting any Windows 10 machine above 4GB, as I did with these, makes a huge performance difference... despite M$ claiming only 4GB is required. Hogwash. At 4GB, two of my laptops perform at an unbearable snail's pace. It doesn't help that Windows 10 tries to perform SO MANY background tasks, esp. at startup. And Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, Google Drive Backup and Sync, and Dropbox apps ALL also contribute to this terrible problem, trying to so grab so many resources (CPU time, system interrupts, RAM/memory, swapping RAM to storage... to HDD or a SSD). It all results in attempts to perform ... MoreNow, about WHY such RAM is needed. This situation causes people to have to get more RAM like this product. This product helps the situation... So, not unique to this product, boosting any Windows 10 machine above 4GB, as I did with these, makes a huge performance difference... despite M$ claiming only 4GB is required. Hogwash. At 4GB, two of my laptops perform at an unbearable snail's pace. It doesn't help that Windows 10 tries to perform SO MANY background tasks, esp. at startup. And Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, Google Drive Backup and Sync, and Dropbox apps ALL also contribute to this terrible problem, trying to so grab so many resources (CPU time, system interrupts, RAM/memory, swapping RAM to storage... to HDD or a SSD). It all results in attempts to perform lots of work just when you are trying to get a PC started an responsive to user inputs and attempts to launch and use one or two simple apps. Have you ever clocked how long all this takes? And all that system indexing, health status polling and reporting, system update checks, anti-malware scanning, data compression and swapping RAM to disk. Scanning caches and user profiles. I have never had any version of Linux bog down like Windows does, especially with a 4GB device. We should not have to use such powerfully equipped computers just to get a smoothly running Windows 10 experience, especially on startup. And M$ doesn't help the average user understand everything that is going on to slow performance. OK, some people know about the simply specified and somewhat well known "startup apps." Users even have their own startup folder to intentionally start desired programs at startup or logon. Fewer people realize how many so called "services" are running for Windows and apps, like the ones mentioned above. And how many of them are simply not necessary. And I'll bet very very few people realize that beyond those two sources for running tasks on Windows, there is YET A THIRD source that launches and runs tasks, possibly despite your efforts to stop such things from running (by disabling "startup apps" and various unnecessary "services"). Windows 10, like other operating systems, has a TASK SCHEDULER that launches and runs many tasks based on many criteria and triggers. Amazingly, if you struggle to disable Google updates, Dropbox updates, Chrome updates, or Edge updates in startup and also in services, if you look at Task Manager to see what's running, you'll be dumbfounded to see tasks for these things somehow mysteriously STILL running anyway. They get launched by the Task Scheduler. All that is to say that you can do several things to help system performance: (1) add more RAM, and (2) disable startup of many many unnecessary tasks. But you have to know what you are disabling and where to disable them. Funny, even a Linux distro running from a USB thumb-drive has minimal performance impact, despite running many tasks with its own task scheduling feature. And it does it with much less RAM and none (or very very little) memory swapping to disk. If you have a HDD, you notice an obviously difference in HDD activity. Windows never stops its continuous and extensive reading and writing to storage. Linux makes very very little such reading and writing to disk storage.
| Warranty | Standard Manufacturer's Warranty |
