Sony FE PZ 16-35mm f/4 G Lens SELP1635G at Etoren
Product Description Designed for Creators A compact design with superb optics and a power zoom function makes the Sony PZ 16-35mm f/4 G an ideal choice for all types of creators, whether that means you shoot video, stills, or both. This ultra-wide lens is among the lightest in its class and the constant f/4 aperture strikes an ideal balance that is bright enough for available-light shooting while remaining portable for all-day shoots.
Product Description Designed for Creators A compact design with superb optics and a power zoom function makes the Sony PZ 16-35mm f/4 G an ideal choice for all types of creators, whether that means you shoot video, stills, or both. This ultra-wide lens is among the lightest in its class and the constant f/4 aperture strikes an ideal balance that is bright enough for available-light shooting while remaining portable for all-day shoots.
Product Description Designed for Creators A compact design with superb optics and a power zoom function makes the Sony PZ 16-35mm f/4 G an ideal choice for all types of creators, whether that means you shoot video, stills, or both. This ultra-wide lens is among the lightest in its class and the constant f/4 aperture strikes an ideal balance that is bright enough for available-light shooting while remaining portable for all-day shoots.
Product Description Designed for Creators A compact design with superb optics and a power zoom function makes the Sony PZ 16-35mm f/4 G an ideal choice for all types of creators, whether that means you shoot video, stills, or both. This ultra-wide lens is among the lightest in its class and the constant f/4 aperture strikes an ideal balance that is bright enough for available-light shooting while remaining portable for all-day shoots.
in 12 offers
The lowest price for Sony FE PZ 16-35mm f/4 G Lens SELP1635G at Etoren right now is $1,234.99 at Techinthebasket AU, compared across 8 retailers.
The all-time low was $539.32 on 11 Mar 2026 β today's price is 129% above the lowest ever. It has been notably cheaper before β worth setting a price alert.
Prices last updated 7 Nov 2026.
Last updated at 07/11/2026 08:15:22
Sony FE PZ 16-35mm f/4 G Lens
Free delivery
Sony FE PZ 16-35mm F4 G
Sony FE PZ 16-35mm f/4 G Lens - Brand New
Free delivery between 11β17 Nov
Sony FE PZ 16-35mm f/4 G Lens SELP1635G at Etoren
Delivery $69
Sony FE PZ 16-35mm f/4 G Lens
Delivery $16.50
Sony Fe Pz 16-35mm F4 Lens Selp1635g E Mount Full-frame Format Jpn
Delivery $29.11
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Sony FE PZ 16-35mm f/4 G Lens
Delivery $99.05
Sony FE PZ 16-35mm F/4 G Lens For E-Mount (Full-Frame Mirrorless Compatible) SELP1635G
Delivery between 12β17 Nov $119.37
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
This lens is perfect for run an gun gimbal work. It's so light and balances easily. Also you don't have to balance when you change the focal length.
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
I have always been a prime-lens addict. I have 20mm f1.8, 24mm f1.4, 50mm f1.2 and 85mm f1.4 Sony lenses. However, I took the chance leaving all my primes home and brought only one lens, FE PZ 16-35MM f4 G, to my trip to Eastern Europe. I was worried about its low light performance, however, my A7IV handled low light situation without any problem and produced clean images with this lens.This lens is ultra light. If this lens has OSS, it would've been perfect.
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
Ultra wide angle zooms are tricky to design and execute. It's all about compromises... It's been a journey to get here, but for me, I have arrived. Let me explain.BTW: I don't do video and this review is based on a 42Mpix sensor.I started my journey with the older Zeiss 16-35mm f4 with OSS. I liked the format, build and size, didn't need OSS in a wide angle lens. I just didn't like the resulting images. They were soft at some focal lengths and especially wider f-stops. I think my copy had issues with CA too, which made images look mushy.Next I went to the Sigma 14-24mm f2.8. This lens is a beast! It has outstanding (Sony GM-tier) image quality everywhere. It's built beautifully too. But I really missed the 24-35 range, didn't find I used the wide bit that much ...Β MoreUltra wide angle zooms are tricky to design and execute. It's all about compromises... It's been a journey to get here, but for me, I have arrived. Let me explain.BTW: I don't do video and this review is based on a 42Mpix sensor.I started my journey with the older Zeiss 16-35mm f4 with OSS. I liked the format, build and size, didn't need OSS in a wide angle lens. I just didn't like the resulting images. They were soft at some focal lengths and especially wider f-stops. I think my copy had issues with CA too, which made images look mushy.Next I went to the Sigma 14-24mm f2.8. This lens is a beast! It has outstanding (Sony GM-tier) image quality everywhere. It's built beautifully too. But I really missed the 24-35 range, didn't find I used the wide bit that much and - boy - does it weigh a lot. Great lens, not what I needed.Next came the affordable and likeable Tamron 17-28 f2.8. This was pretty darn close to what I needed. I did miss the 35mm end but sure liked the small size and weight. I didn't notice the missing millimeter at the wide end really. The images were good, not Sigma-good but better than the Zeiss. f2.8 is nice, but not that necessary in a wide angle zoom for me. Tamron did a good job with this lens and it certainly hits a nice sweet spot on the quality - speed - cost triangle. I got this lens a week before Sony announced its PZ.I read how so many were tickIed by the newer Sony lens and went for it. Since then I've unloaded all the other ultra-wide-angle zooms. This lens is small, light and has consistently excellent images. I really like having this full zoom range - and 35mm is my definition of 'normal'. I personally don't miss f2.8 and definitely don't miss the weight or size of the others. It's the only one with an aperture ring too, which I like a lot. As a still photographer, I had a little trepidation about the power-zoom but honestly it's instantly responsive and fine.Sony made some intelligent choices in making the compromises for this lens, but no compromises were made optically. This suits me to a tee. Hope this helps.
| Effective Pixels | 25 megapixels |
| Sensor Size | Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) |
| Max resolution | 5776 x 4336 |
| Sensor Type | CMOS |
| Processor | Venus Engine |
Sony FE PZ 16-35mm f/4 G Lens
Free delivery
Sony FE PZ 16-35mm F4 G
Sony FE PZ 16-35mm f/4 G Lens - Brand New
Free delivery between 11β17 Nov
Sony FE PZ 16-35mm f/4 G Lens SELP1635G at Etoren
Delivery $69
Sony FE PZ 16-35mm f/4 G Lens
Delivery $16.50
This lens is perfect for run an gun gimbal work. It's so light and balances easily. Also you don't have to balance when you change the focal length.
I have always been a prime-lens addict. I have 20mm f1.8, 24mm f1.4, 50mm f1.2 and 85mm f1.4 Sony lenses. However, I took the chance leaving all my primes home and brought only one lens, FE PZ 16-35MM f4 G, to my trip to Eastern Europe. I was worried about its low light performance, however, my A7IV handled low light situation without any problem and produced clean images with this lens.This lens is ultra light. If this lens has OSS, it would've been perfect.
Ultra wide angle zooms are tricky to design and execute. It's all about compromises... It's been a journey to get here, but for me, I have arrived. Let me explain.BTW: I don't do video and this review is based on a 42Mpix sensor.I started my journey with the older Zeiss 16-35mm f4 with OSS. I liked the format, build and size, didn't need OSS in a wide angle lens. I just didn't like the resulting images. They were soft at some focal lengths and especially wider f-stops. I think my copy had issues with CA too, which made images look mushy.Next I went to the Sigma 14-24mm f2.8. This lens is a beast! It has outstanding (Sony GM-tier) image quality everywhere. It's built beautifully too. But I really missed the 24-35 range, didn't find I used the wide bit that much ...Β MoreUltra wide angle zooms are tricky to design and execute. It's all about compromises... It's been a journey to get here, but for me, I have arrived. Let me explain.BTW: I don't do video and this review is based on a 42Mpix sensor.I started my journey with the older Zeiss 16-35mm f4 with OSS. I liked the format, build and size, didn't need OSS in a wide angle lens. I just didn't like the resulting images. They were soft at some focal lengths and especially wider f-stops. I think my copy had issues with CA too, which made images look mushy.Next I went to the Sigma 14-24mm f2.8. This lens is a beast! It has outstanding (Sony GM-tier) image quality everywhere. It's built beautifully too. But I really missed the 24-35 range, didn't find I used the wide bit that much and - boy - does it weigh a lot. Great lens, not what I needed.Next came the affordable and likeable Tamron 17-28 f2.8. This was pretty darn close to what I needed. I did miss the 35mm end but sure liked the small size and weight. I didn't notice the missing millimeter at the wide end really. The images were good, not Sigma-good but better than the Zeiss. f2.8 is nice, but not that necessary in a wide angle zoom for me. Tamron did a good job with this lens and it certainly hits a nice sweet spot on the quality - speed - cost triangle. I got this lens a week before Sony announced its PZ.I read how so many were tickIed by the newer Sony lens and went for it. Since then I've unloaded all the other ultra-wide-angle zooms. This lens is small, light and has consistently excellent images. I really like having this full zoom range - and 35mm is my definition of 'normal'. I personally don't miss f2.8 and definitely don't miss the weight or size of the others. It's the only one with an aperture ring too, which I like a lot. As a still photographer, I had a little trepidation about the power-zoom but honestly it's instantly responsive and fine.Sony made some intelligent choices in making the compromises for this lens, but no compromises were made optically. This suits me to a tee. Hope this helps.
This lens was a pleasant surprise. It is very small and light weight. I am very please with the sharpness. Even though I only shoot a small amount of video, I find myself mostly using the power zoom feature for still photo shooting.
The preordered lens arrived from B&H a week earlier than predicted. I immediately tested it for any decentering and it is perfectly centered.I only shoot still images.It is astonishingly sharp corner to corner wide open at all focal lengths, nearly as sharp as in the center. This performance I have not previously seen in any zoom lens. I tested it vs. my Zeiss Batis 40 CF, Zeiss Loxia 21 and Laowa 15 Zero-D. Image quality is right up with these primes. Motorized zoom is just fine, instantaneously responsive and precise (vs. the cumbersome motorized zoom in my RX10iv).The different diameters of the aperture, zoom and focus rings aids ergonomics when using the EVF. (Why aren't all zoom lenses like this?)Compared with the Batis 40, it is not as fast but it is ...Β MoreThe preordered lens arrived from B&H a week earlier than predicted. I immediately tested it for any decentering and it is perfectly centered.I only shoot still images.It is astonishingly sharp corner to corner wide open at all focal lengths, nearly as sharp as in the center. This performance I have not previously seen in any zoom lens. I tested it vs. my Zeiss Batis 40 CF, Zeiss Loxia 21 and Laowa 15 Zero-D. Image quality is right up with these primes. Motorized zoom is just fine, instantaneously responsive and precise (vs. the cumbersome motorized zoom in my RX10iv).The different diameters of the aperture, zoom and focus rings aids ergonomics when using the EVF. (Why aren't all zoom lenses like this?)Compared with the Batis 40, it is not as fast but it is also close focus, almost as close. Both are fully weather sealed.Compared with the Loxia 21 it does not create those ultra sharp 10-point aperture stars (which the Loxia does even at middle apertures) but it is fully weather sealed while the Loxia is only sealed at the mount. I still need to confirm what I've read, that this new lens is resistant to flare (as is the Loxia).Compared with the f2 Laowa 15 Zero-D, the Sony zoom is not fast enough for astro, and the direct manual focus of the Laowa for this is advantageous.So where does this fit in my kit? For a two lens travel and hiking kit I'll take the new Sony + my Tamron 70-180. I used to combine the 70-180 with my Batis 40. Both the Batis and the Sony are the same size and weight. When wildflowers are anticipated might still choose the Batis. When night photography is planned I'll substitute my current combination of the Loxia 21mm f2.8 and Laowa 15mm f2.I've added a 72mm set of K&F Concept Magnetic filters. I can easily swap filters and rotate the polarizer without removing the Sony lens hood since there is enough clearance to get a fingertip on the filter edge. No vignetting at 16mm with 1-2 of these thin filters.So I am pleased. I'd like to see Sony create a new f4 24-105 taking advantage of the technology in the 16-35 PZ to incorporate internal zooming and reduce weight and bulk.
| Effective Pixels | 25 megapixels |
| Sensor Size | Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) |
| Max resolution | 5776 x 4336 |
| Sensor Type | CMOS |
| Processor | Venus Engine |
