Kodak Professional 400 Tri-X 120 Film 5 Pack
KODAK TRI-X Pan Film is a high-speed (ISO 400/27o) panchromatic film that is a good choice for photographing dimly lighted subjects or fast action, for photographing subjects that require good depth of field and fast shutter speeds, and for extending the distance range for flash pictures. You can retouch the 120-size film on the emulsion side. TRI-X Pan Film is recommended for push-processing applications. Fine grain Good for producing high-quality images. Wide exposure latitude Rich tonality maintained with over exposure and underexposure. High sharpness Good for applications that require a moderate degree of enlargement. High resolving power Good rendition of detail. Fine grain Good for producing high-quality images. Wide exposure latitude Rich tonality maintained with over exposure and underexposure. High sharpness Good for applications that require a moderate degree of enlargement.
KODAK TRI-X Pan Film is a high-speed (ISO 400/27o) panchromatic film that is a good choice for photographing dimly lighted subjects or fast action, for photographing subjects that require good depth of field and fast shutter speeds, and for extending the distance range for flash pictures. You can retouch the 120-size film on the emulsion side. TRI-X Pan Film is recommended for push-processing applications. Fine grain Good for producing high-quality images. Wide exposure latitude Rich tonality maintained with over exposure and underexposure. High sharpness Good for applications that require a moderate degree of enlargement. High resolving power Good rendition of detail. Fine grain Good for producing high-quality images. Wide exposure latitude Rich tonality maintained with over exposure and underexposure. High sharpness Good for applications that require a moderate degree of enlargement.
KODAK TRI-X Pan Film is a high-speed (ISO 400/27o) panchromatic film that is a good choice for photographing dimly lighted subjects or fast action, for photographing subjects that require good depth of field and fast shutter speeds, and for extending the distance range for flash pictures. You can retouch the 120-size film on the emulsion side. TRI-X Pan Film is recommended for push-processing applications. Fine grain Good for producing high-quality images. Wide exposure latitude Rich tonality maintained with over exposure and underexposure. High sharpness Good for applications that require a moderate degree of enlargement. High resolving power Good rendition of detail. Fine grain Good for producing high-quality images. Wide exposure latitude Rich tonality maintained with over exposure and underexposure. High sharpness Good for applications that require a moderate degree of enlargement.
KODAK TRI-X Pan Film is a high-speed (ISO 400/27o) panchromatic film that is a good choice for photographing dimly lighted subjects or fast action, for photographing subjects that require good depth of field and fast shutter speeds, and for extending the distance range for flash pictures. You can retouch the 120-size film on the emulsion side. TRI-X Pan Film is recommended for push-processing applications. Fine grain Good for producing high-quality images. Wide exposure latitude Rich tonality maintained with over exposure and underexposure. High sharpness Good for applications that require a moderate degree of enlargement. High resolving power Good rendition of detail. Fine grain Good for producing high-quality images. Wide exposure latitude Rich tonality maintained with over exposure and underexposure. High sharpness Good for applications that require a moderate degree of enlargement.
in 25 offers
The lowest price for Kodak Professional 400 Tri-X 120 Film 5 Pack right now is $12.39 at Unique Photo, compared across 23 retailers.
The all-time low was $12.38 on 8 May 2026. That's the lowest price we've ever tracked — a great time to buy.
Prices last updated 13 Sept 2026.
Last updated at 13/09/2026 20:23:34
Kodak Tri-X 400 Black and White Negative Film (120, 1 Roll) 7518558
Delivery $34.61
Kodak Tri-X 400 Black and White Negative Film (120, 5-Pack) 7518558
Delivery $34.61
Kodak Tri-X - 120
Kodak Tri-X Black and White film 120 film roll
Delivery $45.22
Kodak Professional Tri-X 400TX - 120 Black & White Negative Film (Single Roll)
Delivery $12.73
Kodak Tri-X 400TX 120 Film 03 2028 / 1 roll (no box)
Kodak Tri-X Black & White 120mm Film - 400 ISO - Single Roll
Delivery $9.95
Kodak Tri-X Black and White ASA 400 120 Film
Delivery $9.95
Kodak Tri-X 400 TX 120
Delivery between 21–24 Sept $41.27
Kodak Tri-X 400 120 film
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
Three years and eight months ago, I posted a review noting that the paper tapes used to close fresh and exposed Kodak 120mm Tri-X do not work properly: the tape on the fresh roll is too sticky and usually cannot be fully removed, leaving shreds that one has to pick at lest they end up loose inside the camera. Far worse, at the end of the roll, the piece of closing tape that is supposed to adhere to the backing paper strips off inside many cameras, sometimes lodging behind the backing plate. I now have to carry both gaffers tape to close the rolls and a narrow sheet of cardboard to fish the paper tape out from behind the backing plate. I am not alone in this. I ran into a photographer yesterday who says he does the same thing. Are these defective tapes an important ... MoreThree years and eight months ago, I posted a review noting that the paper tapes used to close fresh and exposed Kodak 120mm Tri-X do not work properly: the tape on the fresh roll is too sticky and usually cannot be fully removed, leaving shreds that one has to pick at lest they end up loose inside the camera. Far worse, at the end of the roll, the piece of closing tape that is supposed to adhere to the backing paper strips off inside many cameras, sometimes lodging behind the backing plate. I now have to carry both gaffers tape to close the rolls and a narrow sheet of cardboard to fish the paper tape out from behind the backing plate. I am not alone in this. I ran into a photographer yesterday who says he does the same thing. Are these defective tapes an important issue for Kodak to address, or can the company just let this problem continue indefinitely, as seems to be the plan? Well, I can tell you I have missed many photos messing with these defective tapes, and have been embarrassed chasing after shreds of yellow or white paper. At the beginning and end of every roll I shoot, I curse Kodak for having such contempt for my time and professionalism. Is it good for sales to have your customers cursing your product at the beginning and end of every use? Get it right, Kodak! Are we supposed to wait a decade for you to relearn how to make the paper tapes that worked perfectly for generations? If you read this review and want action, please post a review of you own so that Kodak knows this is a serious problem.
originally posted on analoguewonderland.co.uk
This film brings back memories form my early days, working in a photographic studio, we always used Tri-X when we wanted a bit more contrast. Back to the present day. I spotted the film being offered at a very good price, so being a bit of a bargain hunter I purchased a 5 pack of 120 film. The sample photographs were taken on a homemade 6x12 camera using a 90mm Angulon. The film was rated at box speed and processed in 510 Pyro. I must admit that I do like the results, although I might overexpose and under develop the next rolls to tame the contrast a little more. Overall the results fairly fine grained considering the film speed, and the tonal range is good with the highlights just blowing out a little. Certainly yet another film to add to the use again list.
originally posted on analoguewonderland.co.uk
I've always enjoyed using TriX 400 in 35mm, especially trying to emulate the classic contrasty look of many of my street photography heros. When AW offered a great price on 120 I picked up a few rolls and I'm so glad to see it's just as wonderful in medium format. I've shot some in a 1938 Rolleiflex at box speed and pushed to 1600 both developed in Bellini Euro HC. I've really had to do nothing in post after scanning. The shadows are deep, yet still retain detail and the highlights haven't blown on the images I've taken. The grain is lovely and the sharpness is biting. I will definitely be using again (so long as the price is affordable) and I'm looking forward to trying out some portraits.
| Variant | |
| title | Default Title |
Kodak Tri-X 400 Black and White Negative Film (120, 1 Roll) 7518558
Delivery $34.61
Kodak Tri-X 400 Black and White Negative Film (120, 5-Pack) 7518558
Delivery $34.61
Kodak Tri-X - 120
Kodak Tri-X Black and White film 120 film roll
Delivery $45.22
Kodak Professional Tri-X 400TX - 120 Black & White Negative Film (Single Roll)
Delivery $12.73
Three years and eight months ago, I posted a review noting that the paper tapes used to close fresh and exposed Kodak 120mm Tri-X do not work properly: the tape on the fresh roll is too sticky and usually cannot be fully removed, leaving shreds that one has to pick at lest they end up loose inside the camera. Far worse, at the end of the roll, the piece of closing tape that is supposed to adhere to the backing paper strips off inside many cameras, sometimes lodging behind the backing plate. I now have to carry both gaffers tape to close the rolls and a narrow sheet of cardboard to fish the paper tape out from behind the backing plate. I am not alone in this. I ran into a photographer yesterday who says he does the same thing. Are these defective tapes an important ... MoreThree years and eight months ago, I posted a review noting that the paper tapes used to close fresh and exposed Kodak 120mm Tri-X do not work properly: the tape on the fresh roll is too sticky and usually cannot be fully removed, leaving shreds that one has to pick at lest they end up loose inside the camera. Far worse, at the end of the roll, the piece of closing tape that is supposed to adhere to the backing paper strips off inside many cameras, sometimes lodging behind the backing plate. I now have to carry both gaffers tape to close the rolls and a narrow sheet of cardboard to fish the paper tape out from behind the backing plate. I am not alone in this. I ran into a photographer yesterday who says he does the same thing. Are these defective tapes an important issue for Kodak to address, or can the company just let this problem continue indefinitely, as seems to be the plan? Well, I can tell you I have missed many photos messing with these defective tapes, and have been embarrassed chasing after shreds of yellow or white paper. At the beginning and end of every roll I shoot, I curse Kodak for having such contempt for my time and professionalism. Is it good for sales to have your customers cursing your product at the beginning and end of every use? Get it right, Kodak! Are we supposed to wait a decade for you to relearn how to make the paper tapes that worked perfectly for generations? If you read this review and want action, please post a review of you own so that Kodak knows this is a serious problem.
This film brings back memories form my early days, working in a photographic studio, we always used Tri-X when we wanted a bit more contrast. Back to the present day. I spotted the film being offered at a very good price, so being a bit of a bargain hunter I purchased a 5 pack of 120 film. The sample photographs were taken on a homemade 6x12 camera using a 90mm Angulon. The film was rated at box speed and processed in 510 Pyro. I must admit that I do like the results, although I might overexpose and under develop the next rolls to tame the contrast a little more. Overall the results fairly fine grained considering the film speed, and the tonal range is good with the highlights just blowing out a little. Certainly yet another film to add to the use again list.
I've always enjoyed using TriX 400 in 35mm, especially trying to emulate the classic contrasty look of many of my street photography heros. When AW offered a great price on 120 I picked up a few rolls and I'm so glad to see it's just as wonderful in medium format. I've shot some in a 1938 Rolleiflex at box speed and pushed to 1600 both developed in Bellini Euro HC. I've really had to do nothing in post after scanning. The shadows are deep, yet still retain detail and the highlights haven't blown on the images I've taken. The grain is lovely and the sharpness is biting. I will definitely be using again (so long as the price is affordable) and I'm looking forward to trying out some portraits.
I have been shooting this on my Fuji 69. So grateful that the price is coming down. I used to use this all the time in high school. Back then it was the go to until TMax came around and then that’s all I shot until I picked up a digital camera. Now that I’m back, shooting film and shooting medium format I am blown away! The grain structure beats HP5’s hands down in my opinion. At least in 120 format. Amazing in DDX at 1:9.
I've haven't finished the roll in my camera yet, but I have used this film over the years. I would say it has been my favourite ISO 400 120 roll film for hand held photography. using hand held incident metering. It has never let me down in the Scottish hills, and folk are always delighted with some of the landscape images I have produced with it. It's tonal rendition, sharpness and ability to hold detail in the shadows and highlights are quite superb when commercially processed in Kodak Xtol developer at box speed. Ilford have told me that there's little point sending Tri-X to Harman for processing, because no Ilford developer can take on Xtol as far as Tri-X is concerned, as they're designed for each other, which is why I liked it so much. The commercial lab I now ... MoreI've haven't finished the roll in my camera yet, but I have used this film over the years. I would say it has been my favourite ISO 400 120 roll film for hand held photography. using hand held incident metering. It has never let me down in the Scottish hills, and folk are always delighted with some of the landscape images I have produced with it. It's tonal rendition, sharpness and ability to hold detail in the shadows and highlights are quite superb when commercially processed in Kodak Xtol developer at box speed. Ilford have told me that there's little point sending Tri-X to Harman for processing, because no Ilford developer can take on Xtol as far as Tri-X is concerned, as they're designed for each other, which is why I liked it so much. The commercial lab I now use have a processor with a Fuji product called Negstar or Negastar, which they tell me is the best all round developer for a wide range of emulsions that they have tried, especially the Delta and T-Max ones. At box speed with either hand held incident or spot metering, 120 Ilford Pan-F+, FP4+, are both excellent and recent 35mm Ilford Delta 100 exposed in a Nikon F80 with matrix metering, has come out with much better contrast control than in Xtol. On the unfinished roll of 120 Tri-X in my camera are bright daylight and overcast scenes with mainly landscape and a few architectural scenes. I metered with a hand held Spot Meter, with exposure usually set for the mid-point, or slightly in favour of the shadow areas as the case may be, and it will be interesting to see how the Fuji developer works with it. I will try 120 Ilford HP5+ next on similar subjects as a comparison with Tri-X, processed commercially with the Fuji developer. The recent discount from AW has helped out a lot, but King Kodak 's Tri-X does come at a price.
Sharp as it says. Use it at 320 ISO processed in Perceptol (which at the moment has to be made up using the raw chemicals given a world wide shortage of powder developers). I have pushed it to 1600 developing in ID68 made up (similar to Microphen) but shadow detail not great). Film emulsion is thin and loading 120 film into Jobo reels is tricky. Paterson reels easier
I've enjoyed this at 35mm so stepping up to 120, especially while it's at such a good price, seemed a no-brainer. My first outing with it was late in the evening, but I can't yet safely do long exposures on this camera so I tried it at ISO 1600. This was another step out of my comfort zone but my hope was definitely rewarded. It did me proud in foggy conditions the following day too. The crunch from the increased contrast and grain was just great for these subjects. A happy step on my learning curve and I look forward to using the rest of the box.Thanks to AW for push-processing and giving me confidence in planning for that.
Kodak Tri-X 400 in 120 format.I’ve used a couple of medium format TLR cameras in the past. The favourite being my Mamiya C330. It is though a bit of a lump to carry around on city photo walks. More recently I have purchased a couple of Zeiss Ikon Nettar cameras which I really like. They are very compact medium format cameras as the lens folds away and it’s possible to carry one in a pocket. The lenses are also very sharp.So, being now more into medium format photography I was very pleased to see that Analogue Wonderland have been having a very good promotion on 120 size Kodak Tri-X 400 in boxes of 5 rolls.Kodak Tri-X 400 was one of my favourite films way back about 50 years ago but in more recent years it has been at a price level that I have found unacceptable ... MoreKodak Tri-X 400 in 120 format.I’ve used a couple of medium format TLR cameras in the past. The favourite being my Mamiya C330. It is though a bit of a lump to carry around on city photo walks. More recently I have purchased a couple of Zeiss Ikon Nettar cameras which I really like. They are very compact medium format cameras as the lens folds away and it’s possible to carry one in a pocket. The lenses are also very sharp.So, being now more into medium format photography I was very pleased to see that Analogue Wonderland have been having a very good promotion on 120 size Kodak Tri-X 400 in boxes of 5 rolls.Kodak Tri-X 400 was one of my favourite films way back about 50 years ago but in more recent years it has been at a price level that I have found unacceptable and I’ve gone to using more Ilford films in 120 format.At the new price point though I have begun to try it again and have taken it away on some visits to Devon and Cornwall and using it in one of the Zeiss Nettar cameras and using it with a Weston Master V light meter.These images were taken on fairly overcast days and I shot the film at it’s box speed of 400. Development was done in Rodinal at a dilution of 1+25 for 7 minutes.Tone and contrast is very good and grain just enough to give the images the character that I look for in an analogue image. This experiment has certainly encouraged me to use this film again as long as it isn’t priced a lot different to its’ competitors.The images shown were taken around Brixham harbour.
Having been a victim of the Kodak 120mm backing paper debacle of several years ago -- the word Kodak and the frame numbers from the backing paper appeared legibly on the finished image -- I am sorry to report that Kodak has another serious production problem. The recently updated paper tape that closes the fresh rolls is now too adhesive, and cannot be fully removed from the backing paper. This costs precious time peeling bits of paper to make sure they do not end up inside the camera. Worse yet, the adhesive tape that closes the roll is often not adhesive enough. Sometimes it will not stick immediately; other times it comes loose later. I have also had the closing tape come off inside the camera as I am winding the backing paper onto the spool. We photographers are ... MoreHaving been a victim of the Kodak 120mm backing paper debacle of several years ago -- the word Kodak and the frame numbers from the backing paper appeared legibly on the finished image -- I am sorry to report that Kodak has another serious production problem. The recently updated paper tape that closes the fresh rolls is now too adhesive, and cannot be fully removed from the backing paper. This costs precious time peeling bits of paper to make sure they do not end up inside the camera. Worse yet, the adhesive tape that closes the roll is often not adhesive enough. Sometimes it will not stick immediately; other times it comes loose later. I have also had the closing tape come off inside the camera as I am winding the backing paper onto the spool. We photographers are under enough stress. We need to be able to count on the fact that our best work will not be exposed to light by a Kodak manufacturing problem.I have shot many thousands of rolls of Tri-X 120mm film since the 1980s. In all those years, I have never had a problem with the paper tapes. Kodak, please fix the paper tapes, and let us know when you have it figured out. Otherwise, loyalty has its limits.
Having been a keen user of Kodak Tri-X in the past I was pleased to see the price drop recently. This has encouraged me to try it once again. I loaded up my Zeiss Ikon Nettar with a roll of Tri-X 400120 on a recent trip to Walton-on-Naze. A British seaside town in the winter has a certain bleakness and fascination for me. I thought the contrast and grittiness of the Tri-X would suit the subject very well. So, one Sunday earlier this year I met up with three friends from a Facebook group I’m in at the pier in Walton.The day turned out to be not as rough as last year when we did a similar trip and I didn’t manage to get some rough sea shots. I did though get some great shots of the grey concrete esplanade and even tried a double exposure shot, something which is easy ... MoreHaving been a keen user of Kodak Tri-X in the past I was pleased to see the price drop recently. This has encouraged me to try it once again. I loaded up my Zeiss Ikon Nettar with a roll of Tri-X 400120 on a recent trip to Walton-on-Naze. A British seaside town in the winter has a certain bleakness and fascination for me. I thought the contrast and grittiness of the Tri-X would suit the subject very well. So, one Sunday earlier this year I met up with three friends from a Facebook group I’m in at the pier in Walton.The day turned out to be not as rough as last year when we did a similar trip and I didn’t manage to get some rough sea shots. I did though get some great shots of the grey concrete esplanade and even tried a double exposure shot, something which is easy to do on the Nettar.The film was developed in Ornano Gradual ST 20 which gave a fine grain but a good range of tones. I may in the future try developing this film in Rodinal to get more grain to add to the grittiness of the images.
| Variant | |
| title | Default Title |
