Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro HSM Lens for Sony
Sigma's new Contemporary line of lenses. With its wide zoom range, this lens has a focal range equivalent to 25.5-105mm on a 35mm lens. Thanks to Sigma's latest technologies, it's exceptionally lightweight and 30% more compact by volume than previous lenses of its type. Its low F-number equips photographers to shoot subjects at extremely close range, making this the perfect lens for travel, family photos, artistic compositions, and many other uses. It's a compact lens ideal for everyday use, offering uncompromising optical performance, functionality, quality, and elegance. This lens' minimum focusing distance is 22cm and the maximum magnification ratio is 1:2.8. At 70mm, the working distance becomes 5.52cm. When it comes to telephoto, it can shoot pictures with a similar sensation to a macro lens. Also, without the need to change the lens, it enables photographers to take a close up pictures of subjects such as jewelry and flowers. In order to secure a clear field of view, the design of this lens is very thorough, even down to the precise position of the engraved letters on the lens.
Sigma's new Contemporary line of lenses. With its wide zoom range, this lens has a focal range equivalent to 25.5-105mm on a 35mm lens. Thanks to Sigma's latest technologies, it's exceptionally lightweight and 30% more compact by volume than previous lenses of its type. Its low F-number equips photographers to shoot subjects at extremely close range, making this the perfect lens for travel, family photos, artistic compositions, and many other uses. It's a compact lens ideal for everyday use, offering uncompromising optical performance, functionality, quality, and elegance. This lens' minimum focusing distance is 22cm and the maximum magnification ratio is 1:2.8. At 70mm, the working distance becomes 5.52cm. When it comes to telephoto, it can shoot pictures with a similar sensation to a macro lens. Also, without the need to change the lens, it enables photographers to take a close up pictures of subjects such as jewelry and flowers. In order to secure a clear field of view, the design of this lens is very thorough, even down to the precise position of the engraved letters on the lens.
Sigma's new Contemporary line of lenses. With its wide zoom range, this lens has a focal range equivalent to 25.5-105mm on a 35mm lens. Thanks to Sigma's latest technologies, it's exceptionally lightweight and 30% more compact by volume than previous lenses of its type. Its low F-number equips photographers to shoot subjects at extremely close range, making this the perfect lens for travel, family photos, artistic compositions, and many other uses. It's a compact lens ideal for everyday use, offering uncompromising optical performance, functionality, quality, and elegance. This lens' minimum focusing distance is 22cm and the maximum magnification ratio is 1:2.8. At 70mm, the working distance becomes 5.52cm. When it comes to telephoto, it can shoot pictures with a similar sensation to a macro lens. Also, without the need to change the lens, it enables photographers to take a close up pictures of subjects such as jewelry and flowers. In order to secure a clear field of view, the design of this lens is very thorough, even down to the precise position of the engraved letters on the lens.
Sigma's new Contemporary line of lenses. With its wide zoom range, this lens has a focal range equivalent to 25.5-105mm on a 35mm lens. Thanks to Sigma's latest technologies, it's exceptionally lightweight and 30% more compact by volume than previous lenses of its type. Its low F-number equips photographers to shoot subjects at extremely close range, making this the perfect lens for travel, family photos, artistic compositions, and many other uses. It's a compact lens ideal for everyday use, offering uncompromising optical performance, functionality, quality, and elegance. This lens' minimum focusing distance is 22cm and the maximum magnification ratio is 1:2.8. At 70mm, the working distance becomes 5.52cm. When it comes to telephoto, it can shoot pictures with a similar sensation to a macro lens. Also, without the need to change the lens, it enables photographers to take a close up pictures of subjects such as jewelry and flowers. In order to secure a clear field of view, the design of this lens is very thorough, even down to the precise position of the engraved letters on the lens.
in 3 offers
The lowest price for Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro HSM Lens for Sony right now is $352.87 at eBay.com.au, compared across 2 retailers.
The all-time low was $252.52 on 11 May 2026 — today's price is 40% above the lowest ever. It has been notably cheaper before — worth setting a price alert.
Prices last updated 26 Sept 2026.
Last updated at 26/09/2026 05:22:53
Sigma Lens 17-70mm F2.8-4 Dc Macro Hsm For Sony Used
Delivery $109.34
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Sigma DC Macro (OS) HSM 17-70mm f/2.8-4 Standard Lens for Sony - Black
Delivery $35.55
originally posted on adorama.com
I really like this lens and I recommend it to anyone as a kit upgrade. It checks all the boxes of high quality glass: great sharpness, great contrast and colors and very little distortion. The focus seems to be spot on, right out of the box, I haven't had to connect it to the dock to adjust anything so far. It is quite heavy for the size but feels well built. I have read elsewhere about potential lens creep in either this or the older models of this lens but I haven't experienced it in my lens. I can see, however, that due to the weight of the lens, it takes just a minimum force to extend the lens barrel when pointing down. But it hasn't been a problem so can't hold it against the lens. It's a must buy for a standard range zoom with high aperture.
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
It's a replacement for the EF-S 18-55 kit lens that came with my camera 7 years ago. I received it 2 days before my son's 8th Grade Graduation. I ordered it with a Hoya 72mm UV filter. I shot about 120 photos. The photos are real sharp indoors and outdoors. I got about 4 photos that showed vignetting, it may be due to the Flash or it may also be from the UV filter. You may have to remove the lens hood on certain shots depending on the angle the light strikes the front of the lens. At 17mm, I was able to cover about 30 people; I was 4-5 feet from the first row. It's definitely a good lens in events, it has just the right, yet useful range. I have yet to try shooting landscapes and architectures and I'm sure it'll do just fine. The lens hood came off a couple of times ... MoreIt's a replacement for the EF-S 18-55 kit lens that came with my camera 7 years ago. I received it 2 days before my son's 8th Grade Graduation. I ordered it with a Hoya 72mm UV filter. I shot about 120 photos. The photos are real sharp indoors and outdoors. I got about 4 photos that showed vignetting, it may be due to the Flash or it may also be from the UV filter. You may have to remove the lens hood on certain shots depending on the angle the light strikes the front of the lens. At 17mm, I was able to cover about 30 people; I was 4-5 feet from the first row. It's definitely a good lens in events, it has just the right, yet useful range. I have yet to try shooting landscapes and architectures and I'm sure it'll do just fine. The lens hood came off a couple of times whenever it autofocused. Install the lens hood correctly by switching the AF/MF switch to MF, hold the lens so it won't turn while screwing in the hood until it clicks or the horizontal line on the hood aligns with the horizontal line on the lens. The lens cap tends to pop off, too. Other than this, I'm very happy with this lens. It's built like a tank, yet not as hefty, it's definitely a vast upgrade from the kit lens. This is the second lens I ordered from B&H, they have excellent customer support.
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
I bought this lens for my 60D and to compliment Canon L, & Tamron SP... 70-300mm lens. I have a Canon 24-105mm L and thought this a good lens to use when not taking the Canon out. But to my surprise when comparing these 2 lens, I discovered my Canon L was soft in comparison, the Sigma 17-70mm also had better color, contrast, and less flair. That was hard for me to accept at 1st, that this inexpensive Sigma was out performing or matching my Canon L, and I thought I must be doing something wrong. But after more testing and comparing the results were correct. The Canon was softer. The Sigma does have burrel distortion at 17mm, but I set it most times at 24mm focal range on the wide end to get around that. The Canon 24-105mm L is better build and does have weather ... MoreI bought this lens for my 60D and to compliment Canon L, & Tamron SP... 70-300mm lens. I have a Canon 24-105mm L and thought this a good lens to use when not taking the Canon out. But to my surprise when comparing these 2 lens, I discovered my Canon L was soft in comparison, the Sigma 17-70mm also had better color, contrast, and less flair. That was hard for me to accept at 1st, that this inexpensive Sigma was out performing or matching my Canon L, and I thought I must be doing something wrong. But after more testing and comparing the results were correct. The Canon was softer. The Sigma does have burrel distortion at 17mm, but I set it most times at 24mm focal range on the wide end to get around that. The Canon 24-105mm L is better build and does have weather sealing, but costs a lot more. I handle my gear gently, I'm not a Pro, and don't use my gear out in extreme weather. For the saved money between the 2, the sigma a better value. Much as I loved my 24-105mm L I sold it. In fact, I'm not sure I'll be buying anymore Canon L's unless I have some need. Unless I turn Pro and have a need for Pro gear, I think I can find quality/IQ in lens that will satisfy my needs, that won't break the bank. Canon L lens is great for those who need quality on that level. But I'm finding that for the average peep like me it may be a waste of good money and overkill. I was told that very thing by some Pros when I 1st got into Photography. But I had to learn the hard way....and that can be costly.
| General | |
| Length | 8.2 cm |
| Diameter | 7.9 cm |
| Weight | 465 g |
| Lens System |
Sigma Lens 17-70mm F2.8-4 Dc Macro Hsm For Sony Used
Delivery $109.34
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Sigma DC Macro (OS) HSM 17-70mm f/2.8-4 Standard Lens for Sony - Black
Delivery $35.55
I really like this lens and I recommend it to anyone as a kit upgrade. It checks all the boxes of high quality glass: great sharpness, great contrast and colors and very little distortion. The focus seems to be spot on, right out of the box, I haven't had to connect it to the dock to adjust anything so far. It is quite heavy for the size but feels well built. I have read elsewhere about potential lens creep in either this or the older models of this lens but I haven't experienced it in my lens. I can see, however, that due to the weight of the lens, it takes just a minimum force to extend the lens barrel when pointing down. But it hasn't been a problem so can't hold it against the lens. It's a must buy for a standard range zoom with high aperture.
It's a replacement for the EF-S 18-55 kit lens that came with my camera 7 years ago. I received it 2 days before my son's 8th Grade Graduation. I ordered it with a Hoya 72mm UV filter. I shot about 120 photos. The photos are real sharp indoors and outdoors. I got about 4 photos that showed vignetting, it may be due to the Flash or it may also be from the UV filter. You may have to remove the lens hood on certain shots depending on the angle the light strikes the front of the lens. At 17mm, I was able to cover about 30 people; I was 4-5 feet from the first row. It's definitely a good lens in events, it has just the right, yet useful range. I have yet to try shooting landscapes and architectures and I'm sure it'll do just fine. The lens hood came off a couple of times ... MoreIt's a replacement for the EF-S 18-55 kit lens that came with my camera 7 years ago. I received it 2 days before my son's 8th Grade Graduation. I ordered it with a Hoya 72mm UV filter. I shot about 120 photos. The photos are real sharp indoors and outdoors. I got about 4 photos that showed vignetting, it may be due to the Flash or it may also be from the UV filter. You may have to remove the lens hood on certain shots depending on the angle the light strikes the front of the lens. At 17mm, I was able to cover about 30 people; I was 4-5 feet from the first row. It's definitely a good lens in events, it has just the right, yet useful range. I have yet to try shooting landscapes and architectures and I'm sure it'll do just fine. The lens hood came off a couple of times whenever it autofocused. Install the lens hood correctly by switching the AF/MF switch to MF, hold the lens so it won't turn while screwing in the hood until it clicks or the horizontal line on the hood aligns with the horizontal line on the lens. The lens cap tends to pop off, too. Other than this, I'm very happy with this lens. It's built like a tank, yet not as hefty, it's definitely a vast upgrade from the kit lens. This is the second lens I ordered from B&H, they have excellent customer support.
I bought this lens for my 60D and to compliment Canon L, & Tamron SP... 70-300mm lens. I have a Canon 24-105mm L and thought this a good lens to use when not taking the Canon out. But to my surprise when comparing these 2 lens, I discovered my Canon L was soft in comparison, the Sigma 17-70mm also had better color, contrast, and less flair. That was hard for me to accept at 1st, that this inexpensive Sigma was out performing or matching my Canon L, and I thought I must be doing something wrong. But after more testing and comparing the results were correct. The Canon was softer. The Sigma does have burrel distortion at 17mm, but I set it most times at 24mm focal range on the wide end to get around that. The Canon 24-105mm L is better build and does have weather ... MoreI bought this lens for my 60D and to compliment Canon L, & Tamron SP... 70-300mm lens. I have a Canon 24-105mm L and thought this a good lens to use when not taking the Canon out. But to my surprise when comparing these 2 lens, I discovered my Canon L was soft in comparison, the Sigma 17-70mm also had better color, contrast, and less flair. That was hard for me to accept at 1st, that this inexpensive Sigma was out performing or matching my Canon L, and I thought I must be doing something wrong. But after more testing and comparing the results were correct. The Canon was softer. The Sigma does have burrel distortion at 17mm, but I set it most times at 24mm focal range on the wide end to get around that. The Canon 24-105mm L is better build and does have weather sealing, but costs a lot more. I handle my gear gently, I'm not a Pro, and don't use my gear out in extreme weather. For the saved money between the 2, the sigma a better value. Much as I loved my 24-105mm L I sold it. In fact, I'm not sure I'll be buying anymore Canon L's unless I have some need. Unless I turn Pro and have a need for Pro gear, I think I can find quality/IQ in lens that will satisfy my needs, that won't break the bank. Canon L lens is great for those who need quality on that level. But I'm finding that for the average peep like me it may be a waste of good money and overkill. I was told that very thing by some Pros when I 1st got into Photography. But I had to learn the hard way....and that can be costly.
As a long time Nikon user (since EM days) this is my first Sigma lens, apart from a Tamron bought when I was a student in the very early 1980s I have always bought Nikkors. Have been without a mid-range zoom for a while since I bust both my 18-200 and later my 18-70 in falls/drops. Was considering the Nikon 16-85 mm f3.5-5.6G which I borrowed briefly and quite liked, however, then found rumour that it was supposed to be imminently replaced with a f4 version. However, I gave up waiting for this f4 (actually likely to be f4.1-4.9) version this Summer as needed something to use for mid range - have 10-24, 35 mm f1.8 and a 70-210 but lost my 50 mm f1.4 so mid range a bit uncovered. Especially when it seems probable that when the Nikon 16-85 mm 'f4' is eventually ... MoreAs a long time Nikon user (since EM days) this is my first Sigma lens, apart from a Tamron bought when I was a student in the very early 1980s I have always bought Nikkors. Have been without a mid-range zoom for a while since I bust both my 18-200 and later my 18-70 in falls/drops. Was considering the Nikon 16-85 mm f3.5-5.6G which I borrowed briefly and quite liked, however, then found rumour that it was supposed to be imminently replaced with a f4 version. However, I gave up waiting for this f4 (actually likely to be f4.1-4.9) version this Summer as needed something to use for mid range - have 10-24, 35 mm f1.8 and a 70-210 but lost my 50 mm f1.4 so mid range a bit uncovered. Especially when it seems probable that when the Nikon 16-85 mm 'f4' is eventually released it will cost double what Wex are currently selling this Sigma for I decided to go for the 17-70 f2.8-4.In short I am very pleased indeed with no regrets. The lens is weighty but not too much so and balances nicely on my D7000. Seems very well made and good looking - much better quality than for example my daughter's Nikon 18-55 VR and I would judge better build than my Nikon 10-24. Smooth zoom action, no lens creep. Very sharp indeed with good colour. Focuses fast and I find the bokeh pleasant. The macro while obviously not for 1:1 small bug work is ideal for casual use such as my habit of snapping garden flowers.When considering this review the only demerits from my perspective that would make it not quite 'perfect for 5 stars are very minor - the zoom action is opposite twist to that I have been used to with Nikkors (so what), no weather sealing gasket at mount (not a determined wet weather photographer) and sometimes seems very slightly slow to 'wake up'. Otherwise excellent - would really give it 4.5 stars and highly recommended, this will not be coming off my camera often for a long time.Icing on the cake is that Sigma have just announced a 4 year warranty for all Art, Contemporary and Sport lenses purchased after 1st July (I bought 17/7/13) so have bumped it to 5 stars for that as excellent value for money.(p.s. good service from Wex as usual)
Great upgrade to the kit lens - takes nice wide angle and macro stuff but also has a bit of zoom for some great framing options. Is it built like a Canon? No! It's plastic mostly - which makes it lighter - but I do question the long term viability of the construction. Clarity is phenomenal for the price however - especially used. Overall, great all around versatile lens for just about any application with a nice range of focus and low 2.8 aperture. For the price you really can't go wrong - give it a shot! (no pun intended!)
I've been using the 18-55 kit lens with a Canon T5i for about three years now. I had my eye on either the Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 or the 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6. One had a larger aperture, and the other had a wider range. This lens is a combination of both of those features, and it is very sharp! I mostly shoot landscapes, but I've had this lens for about a month and I've tried all types of photography with it. Portraits, landscapes, macro, and astro-photography, this lens does all of these well. It focuses a little slowly, so action or sports are not the best applications for it. I have taken more pictures since I got it, it has made photography fun again.
I love my Sigma 18-35 1.8, but I wanted something with more range, that was still wide. I figured I would try this 17-70. It's not an ART lens, but I knew that, and I knew it was 2.8-4. However I though that it would stop down naturally when zooming, like with my video camera, instead it's like digital hard stops. Now I'm often just reframing, but this is still jilting, and also it sometimes seemed the camera was trying to compensate for this, even though I was in manual mode. I just figured it would be a loss of light while zooming in, but I almost wonder if this thing could be 2.8 all the way, except for whatever communication it has with the camera that makes it stop down to 4 on the long end. Conspiracy theories aside, this lens has a great range for an APS-C ... MoreI love my Sigma 18-35 1.8, but I wanted something with more range, that was still wide. I figured I would try this 17-70. It's not an ART lens, but I knew that, and I knew it was 2.8-4. However I though that it would stop down naturally when zooming, like with my video camera, instead it's like digital hard stops. Now I'm often just reframing, but this is still jilting, and also it sometimes seemed the camera was trying to compensate for this, even though I was in manual mode. I just figured it would be a loss of light while zooming in, but I almost wonder if this thing could be 2.8 all the way, except for whatever communication it has with the camera that makes it stop down to 4 on the long end. Conspiracy theories aside, this lens has a great range for an APS-C camera. I used it on my 70d and 60d. Images are sharp, colors look great. It's not full time manual, meaning you can't try to adjust focus when it's AutoFocus mode, it makes a noise if you try. I can do this with my 18-35 though, without breaking it.I really got this for video, although for stills it would be great too. I just needed a way to cover more range without having to constantly switch lenses and possibly miss shots. I just can't get past f4, at least not on the 70d, and if I was stuck at f4 and down, I would probably get the 24-105 Sigmaa. This lens worked pretty well, but I definitely found myself using a 2.8 lens more, especially for indoor work, or of course the 1.8 18-35 Sigma. If you keep your work stopped below f4 anyway, this might be a great lens, but just expecting more from Sigma at this point. Why not fixed at 3.2 or something?? That I could buy into as an Art lens.
Fits the bill as the perfect walk around lens for my 77D. Image quality is very good with nice color rendition and weighs half as much as the 24-105 f/4L. If you shoot both full frame and crop sensor I say get this lens for your crop sensor camera and leave your 24-105 f/4L on you full frame camera. (I can say this because I do) I think you will be happy with the results.You will be hard pressed to find a better lens in this focal range for an apsc camera. I am not saying that there aren't any, but cost an functionality helped me make my decision and I don't have any regrets.The one thing that I wish this lens had is a zoom lock. It doesn't suffer from lens creep but if you use a strap that allows your camera to hang on your side the movement when you walk will ... MoreFits the bill as the perfect walk around lens for my 77D. Image quality is very good with nice color rendition and weighs half as much as the 24-105 f/4L. If you shoot both full frame and crop sensor I say get this lens for your crop sensor camera and leave your 24-105 f/4L on you full frame camera. (I can say this because I do) I think you will be happy with the results.You will be hard pressed to find a better lens in this focal range for an apsc camera. I am not saying that there aren't any, but cost an functionality helped me make my decision and I don't have any regrets.The one thing that I wish this lens had is a zoom lock. It doesn't suffer from lens creep but if you use a strap that allows your camera to hang on your side the movement when you walk will cause it to zoom out as it rubs on your side. Not a deal breaker though.
The version I got is the Sigma 17-70 F/2.8-4 DC Macro HSM. It is not the OS (Optical Stabilzer) model. This particular version is in the Pentax K mount so OS was not needed anyways. Since vetting the lens, I've put it through the ringer. Shot Portraits both with off camera flash and natural light wide open. Low light portraits wide open. Each situation resulted in near prime lens sharpness. Astrophotography was a bit difficult because the lens can focus past infinity and the throw isn't very long, so making micro adjustments is pretty hard to pull off. The flip side is this, once It's dialed in, the contrast, saturation and color are amazing! The details really stand out. I was told by a number of my pro photog friends to grab the 17-50 2.8 since it's a fixed ... MoreThe version I got is the Sigma 17-70 F/2.8-4 DC Macro HSM. It is not the OS (Optical Stabilzer) model. This particular version is in the Pentax K mount so OS was not needed anyways. Since vetting the lens, I've put it through the ringer. Shot Portraits both with off camera flash and natural light wide open. Low light portraits wide open. Each situation resulted in near prime lens sharpness. Astrophotography was a bit difficult because the lens can focus past infinity and the throw isn't very long, so making micro adjustments is pretty hard to pull off. The flip side is this, once It's dialed in, the contrast, saturation and color are amazing! The details really stand out. I was told by a number of my pro photog friends to grab the 17-50 2.8 since it's a fixed aperture. I decided not to since if I want a shallow depth of field I can use the compression of the extra 20 mm in focal length for pretty much the same effect at F/4 as I would get with 50 mm at 2.8. Not to mention the extreme close focusing that the 17-70 allows is awesome! It's not true 1:1 macro but with the proper post processing technique you can easily create 1:1 macros with this lens without loss of quality. I highly recommend this lens if you're looking for a high quality lens for travel, walk around, landscapesand portraits and/or you'd like an upgrade from the kit lens. Just keep in mind that the Sigma isn't weather sealed.
I have had this lens for a little bit now. Was able to test it out in several conditions. Turns out to be a good investment. Good walk around lens, especially for outings with family where you switch from landscape to group shots to portraits. the close focusing feature allowed for some macro shots of flowers hand held, bugs you have to be careful as you get so close that the shadow of the lens may scare them off. I used my copy on a 70D. Out of the box it works, focus is fast enough to catch running subjects, about 80% usable shots on rapid fire. Landscapes are nice, improvement over the 18-55 stm. Lens is fast, I found myself not shooting too much at f2.8 at 17mm, but alot at 50-70 and f4. Chromatic aberration is not noticeable. One thing as it is with any lens, ... MoreI have had this lens for a little bit now. Was able to test it out in several conditions. Turns out to be a good investment. Good walk around lens, especially for outings with family where you switch from landscape to group shots to portraits. the close focusing feature allowed for some macro shots of flowers hand held, bugs you have to be careful as you get so close that the shadow of the lens may scare them off. I used my copy on a 70D. Out of the box it works, focus is fast enough to catch running subjects, about 80% usable shots on rapid fire. Landscapes are nice, improvement over the 18-55 stm. Lens is fast, I found myself not shooting too much at f2.8 at 17mm, but alot at 50-70 and f4. Chromatic aberration is not noticeable. One thing as it is with any lens, in low contrast situations the lens hunts for focus. I did not find the zoom ring stiff but that is personal preference. Big plus for me is that front element does not move when focusing. Overall IQ seems better than the kit lens I used. I am pleased with this investment.
| General | |
| Length | 8.2 cm |
| Diameter | 7.9 cm |
| Weight | 465 g |
| Lens System |
