Asus ROG Swift PG27AQDP 26.5inch 480Hz QHD OLED Gaming Monitor

As I was in the market for a high-end OLED monitor, my biggest challenge was deciding between W-OLED or QD-OLED. Specifically, the 3rd gen OLEDs found in the ASUS PG32 UCDP and UCDM. So, I did a lot of research and comparisons and ended up with Asus PG32UCDP.My main reasons for choosing the PG32UCDP were obviously a better price (at least in Australia, as compared to PG32UCDM), better handling of ambient light, better brightness, better HDR and features such as 1080p 480Hz.Well, I guess both of these monitors are the top options currently available in the market for gaming. They are quite similar in terms of features yet they have some key differences also that set them apart.Coating: The UCDP has a matte coating, while the UCDM has a glossy one. It’s ... MoreAs I was in the market for a high-end OLED monitor, my biggest challenge was deciding between W-OLED or QD-OLED. Specifically, the 3rd gen OLEDs found in the ASUS PG32 UCDP and UCDM. So, I did a lot of research and comparisons and ended up with Asus PG32UCDP.My main reasons for choosing the PG32UCDP were obviously a better price (at least in Australia, as compared to PG32UCDM), better handling of ambient light, better brightness, better HDR and features such as 1080p 480Hz.Well, I guess both of these monitors are the top options currently available in the market for gaming. They are quite similar in terms of features yet they have some key differences also that set them apart.Coating: The UCDP has a matte coating, while the UCDM has a glossy one. It’s important to note that the matte finish on the UCDP is nowhere near as aggressive as traditional “gaming” monitors, and the glossy finish on the UCDM isn’t as glossy as OLED TVs, such as LG C3/C4.Screen: When displaying black the UCDP is simply pitch black in any light condition, making content “pop” in any situation. The only mark against the UCDP and its matte coating is when displaying full white and getting really close to the screen, and there is a slight visible grainy look. IMO, it’s not noticeable at all in normal use.Colors: I think the UCDM does get slightly more vibrant, but the UCDP gets brighter, especially when displaying white. There is a quick trick to fix that color punch in UCDP. Go to your ‘nVidia control panel’ (if you have an nVidia GPU) and increase the ‘digital vibrance’ to 65%, and it's almost as punchy as UCDM in the colour department.HDR: According to my research, I think the UCDP looks slightly better due to its higher brightness.Conclusion: I think it’s a no-brainer to pick the UDCP, and no need to pay the extra AUD 350. Save that money and spend it on something else.It’s an absolute treat monitor that you will enjoy for years but don’t forget it will leave a hole in your wallet. 😊Enjoy!

Trelivg Monitor att spela med.Nedan kommer inställningar,AI Shadow Boost.ONGaming Variable Refresh Rate.ONGame Visual UserModeBrightness 50Uniform Brightness.ONContrast 79Display Color Space WideGamutColorTemp UserSaturation 60Gamma 2.2Auto Logo Brightness ONTaskbar Detection ONLocal Dimming Control ONOLED Usage InfoTime Track 65hrsPixel clean Times 21Pixel Clean Interval 1hrsPower Setting Perform ON